Authentic Writing Assessment In Nursing Education, Low-Tech Digital Assessment In Resource-Constrained Nursing Classrooms
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56667/de_journal.v7i02.2289Kata Kunci:
asesmen autentik, Bahasa Inggris bagi Keperawatan, keterampilan menulis, digital berbasis teknologi sederhana, pendidikan keperawatanAbstrak
Penelitian ini mengembangkan dan mengevaluasi asesmen menulis autentik digital berbasis teknologi sederhana untuk mahasiswa English for Nursing pada lingkungan pembelajaran dengan keterbatasan sumber daya. Berlandaskan teori English for Specific Purposes, asesmen autentik, serta prinsip kegunaan asesmen bahasa, produk ini menekankan aspek validitas, reliabilitas, autentisitas, kepraktisan, dan dampak pendidikan. Penelitian ini menggunakan desain Educational Research and Development dengan model ADDIE yang dimodifikasi, meliputi tahap analisis, desain, pengembangan, validasi ahli, implementasi terbatas, dan evaluasi. Uji coba melibatkan 37 mahasiswa English for Nursing dan tiga validator yang terdiri atas satu ahli bahasa Inggris dan dua ahli pendidikan keperawatan. Data dikumpulkan melalui analisis dokumen, analisis kebutuhan, lembar validasi, tes menulis, angket kepraktisan, dan umpan balik pengguna. Data kuantitatif dianalisis menggunakan Aiken’s V, Cronbach’s alpha, intraclass correlation coefficients, persentase kepraktisan, normalized gain, paired-samples t-test, dan Cohen’s d. Hasil analisis kebutuhan menunjukkan tingkat kebutuhan yang sangat tinggi dengan nilai rata-rata keseluruhan sebesar 4,43. Asesmen yang dikembangkan memperoleh rata-rata Aiken’s V sebesar 0,90, Cronbach’s alpha sebesar 0,891, ICC single measure sebesar 0,82, dan ICC average measure sebesar 0,93. Tingkat kepraktisan menurut mahasiswa mencapai 88,2%, sedangkan kepraktisan menurut ahli dan pengguna mencapai 91,2%. Skor menulis mahasiswa meningkat dari 68,84 menjadi 79,27, yang menunjukkan efektivitas awal yang menjanjikan, meskipun penelitian ini belum menggunakan kelompok kontrol dan masih terbatas pada uji coba di satu institusi.
Unduhan
Referensi
Almeman, K., EL Ayeb, F., Berrima, M., Issaoui, B., & Morsy, H. (2025). The Integration of AI and Metaverse in Education: A Systematic Literature Review. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 15(2), 50–65. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15020863
Asli, N. F., Mohd Matore, M. E. E., & Md Yunus, M. (2024). Construct validity of primary trait writing rubrics based on assessment use argument (AUA) validation framework. Heliyon, 10(22), e40053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40053
Astutik, I., Widiati, U., Ratri, D. P., Jonathans, P. M., Nurkamilah, N., Devanti, Y. M., & Harfal, Z. (2024). Transformative Practices: Integrating Automated Writing Evaluation in Higher Education Writing Classrooms - A Systematic Review. Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE), 6(3), 423–441. https://doi.org/10.23917/ijolae.v6i3.23675
Benchadlia, F., Rabia, Q., & Abderrahim, K. (2023). Simulation in Basic Nursing Student Education: Uses and Barriers. The Open Nursing Journal, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.2174/18744346-v17-230717-2023-198
Brookhart, S. M. (2018). Appropriate Criteria: Key to Effective Rubrics. Frontiers in Education, 3(April). https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2018.00022
Carey, M. D., Davidow, S., & Williams, P. (2022). Re-imagining narrative writing and assessment: a post-NAPLAN craft-based rubric for creative writing. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 45(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44020-022-00004-4
Fisma. (2024). Assessing the English Language Needs of Nursing Students: A Systematic Review. JOEY: Journal of English Ibrahimy, 3(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.35316/joey.2024.v3i2.1-10
Fitria, T. N. (2023). Using Google Forms as an Online Learning Assessment Tool for Non-EFL Students. Journal of English Language Teaching, Linguistics, and Literature Studies, 3(2), 64. https://doi.org/10.30984/jeltis.v3i2.2641
Harrison, N., Edmonds, M., Meads, C., Abdulmohdi, N., Prothero, L., & Shaw, S. (2024). Simulation in nursing education: An evidence base for the future. Council of Deans of Health and Anglia Ruskin University.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
Hu, A., Liu, Q., & Daniel, B. (2025). Digital Technologies in Authentic Assessment in Higher Education: A Systematic Literature Review and Narrative Synthesis. SAGE Open, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251357198
Huseynova, F. (2023). Authentic assessment in developing students’ english language skills. Bulletin of Postgraduate Education (Series), 25(54), 86–104. https://doi.org/10.58442/2218-7650-2023-25(54)-86-104
Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for specific purposes: A learning-centred approach. Cambridge University Press.
Kania, N., Kusumah, Y. S., Dahlan, J. A., Nurlaelah, E., Gürbüz, F., & Bonyah, E. (2024). Constructing and providing content validity evidence through the Aiken’s V index based on the experts’ judgments of the instrument to measure mathematical problem-solving skills. REID (Research and Evaluation in Education), 10(1), 64–79. https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v10i1.71032
Khojasteh, L., Kafipour, R., Pakdel, F., & Mukundan, J. (2025). Empowering medical students with AI writing co-pilots: design and validation of AI self-assessment toolkit. BMC Medical Education, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-06753-3
Marleni, L., Syarif, H., & Zainil, Y. (2023). ESP for Nurse: A Curriculum Analysis. Journal of Education Research, 4(4), 2452–2460. https://doi.org/10.37985/jer.v4i4.757
Maxnun, L., Kristiani, K., & Sulistyaningrum, C. D. (2024). Development of hots-based cognitive assessment instruments: ADDIE model. Journal of Education and Learning, 18(2), 489–498. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v18i2.21079
Nieminen, J. H., Bearman, M., & Ajjawi, R. (2023). Designing the digital in authentic assessment: is it fit for purpose? Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 48(4), 529–543. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2022.2089627
Orfanò, B. M., & Wingate, U. (2024). Teaching Academic Writing To Nursing Students: Developing Criticality Through a Genre-Based Approach. ESP Today, 12(1), 118–135. https://doi.org/10.18485/esptoday.2024.12.1.6
Rohmani, N., Zulkarnaen, D., & Winar Cahyo, P. (2024). Web-Based Nursing Care Documentation for Students to Support Online Learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 25(4), 52–65. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v25i4.7758
Salifu, D. A., Heymans, Y., & Christmals, C. Dela. (2022). A Simulation-Based Clinical Nursing Education Framework for a Low-Resource Setting: A Multimethod Study. Healthcare (Switzerland), 10(9), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10091639
Salifu, D. A., Heymans, Y., & Christmals, C. Dela. (2022). Facilitating the Development of Clinical Competence in a Low-Resource Setting: Perceptions and Challenges of Nurse Educators. Nurse Media Journal of Nursing, 12(1), 42–60. https://doi.org/10.14710/nmjn.v12i1.43995
Sari, T. S. (2026). English For Nursing : A Need Analysis of Contextual- Based Language Teaching. 15(1), 1283–1292.
SB, Handayani. (2023). Enhancing English For Nursing: A Comprehensive Needs Analysis For Effective Communication In Emergency Nursing Study Programs. Journal of Humanity Studies, 2(2), 107–124. https://doi.org/10.22202/jhs.2023.v2i2.7686
Sekarsari, A. A., Muamaroh, M., & Hikmat, M. H. (2023). Authentic Assessment of Speaking Skills in Junior High School. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 11(1), 630–637. https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v11i1.3854
Setiawan, A., Cendana, W., Ayres, M., Yuldashev, A. A., & Setyawati, S. P. (2023). Development and validation of a self-assessment-based instrument to measure elementary school students’ attitudes in online learning. REID (Research and Evaluation in Education), 9(2), 184–197. https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v9i2.52083
Sudusinghe, W. S., & Gamage, C. K. W. (2023). The Importance of English Language Proficiency for the Success of Nursing Education in Sri Lanka. South-East Asian Journal of Medical Education, 17(1), 39–42. https://doi.org/10.4038/seajme.v17i1.529
Vlachopoulos, D., & Makri, A. (2024). A systematic literature review on authentic assessment in higher education: Best practices for the development of 21st century skills, and policy considerations. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 83(November), 101425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101425
Widanta, I. M. R. J., Putra, I. M. A., Ardika, I. W. D., & Hidayanti, N. N. A. T. (2023). Developing English for Nurses in Indonesia: From Learning Supporting Tools to Assessment. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 13(4), 917–926. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1304.13
Zaim, M., Refnaldi, & Arsyad, S. (2020). Authentic assessment for speaking skills: Problem and solution for english secondary school teachers in Indonesia. International Journal of Instruction, 13(3), 587–604. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13340a
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2026 Dharmas Education Journal (DE_Journal)
Artikel ini berlisensi Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Makalah yang disampaikan diasumsikan tidak mengandung bahan propietary yang tidak dilindungi oleh hak paten
